bloodline creation (was Regent classes)

On Thu, 12 Dec 2002, Michael Romes wrote:
> Germanic Huns?

Snip, yeah, whatever, I was just generally blanketing them in with the
germanic tribes that invaded Rome for several hundred years, my bad.

> > Maybe each army only had 50,000 men.
> >There were six tribes, the dwarves, the goblins, the elves, plus
> >miscellaneous gnolls, ogres, and giants. Just counting humans, there
> >could have been 300,000 at the battle. Does that sound too high?
>
> Yes.
> First at the battle of Deismaar there were not a single wizard. The
> elves were sorcerors and no human had a bloodline prior to Deismaar, so
> only Magicians - or perhaps those few who dealed with Azrai and became
> the Lost.

I didnt say there were human wizards there, I said 300,000 men. Whether elves are sorcerors or wizards (in 3e) is a matter of taste. I say there are no sorcerors in BR, just wizards, but its not germane anyway, because
we`re talking about humans, /after/ Deismaar.

Yes. Take the PS of Medoere for example. It states that only 5% of the
population are nobles (both religious and secular) and only a handful of
familys have blooded individuals, and no more than 20 (TWENTY!) people
in the whole domain are blooded.

Sounds low- it doesnt fit with the demographics. Even if the blooded only married each other (after a generation or two, the gender balance wouldnt be right at the beginning), the population would still tend to
grow. Even if there were only a thousand blooded Anuireans after
Deismaar, there would be many more than that in modern Cerilia. Heck,
they`d grow faster than the general population, because they end up
wealthy, often have magical powers, and gain more access to clerical
healing magic.

They wouldn`t all be high bloodline, because it would tend to dilute over
time, but there would be a lot of them.

Your example of 700000 or only 300000 seems to assume that everyone who
was at the battle became blooded - I do not remember to have read this
somewhere.

Right- all bloodlines were created in people near the explosion, but not
all people near the explosion got bloodlines. It seems pretty
indiscriminate, though, since elves and dwarves both got bloodlines from
human gods.

They dont have to have bred like rabbits. Go with that 1000 number up above. Say they average 1% growth per generation (rather low, medieval population growth was around .35% per year), taking into account plagues, poor harvests, Gorgon cullings, and whatnot. If a generation is 30 years, there have been ~50 since Deismaar. Thered be 1,645 scions in Anuire.
A similar number in other regions. Half have the mental capacity to
become wizards.

A bloodline requirement alone probably isn`t sufficient to limit wizards
to 6 or 7 score.

Communication is possible only between equals.
Daniel McSorley- mcsorley@cis.ohio-state.edu


The Birthright Homepage: http://www.birthright.net
Birthright-l Archives: http://oracle.wizards.com/archives/birthright-l.html
To unsubscribe, send email to LISTSERV@ORACLE.WIZARDS.COM
with UNSUB BIRTHRIGHT-L in the body of the message.

----- Original Message -----
From: “daniel mcsorley” <mcsorley@CIS.OHIO-STATE.EDU>
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 12:38 PM

> Perhaps most Anuirean lords aspire toward warriorship and not wizardry,
> but the Khinasi esteem wizards highly and would probably have more. It`s

not real hard to break that 6 or 7 score wizards in Cerilia line.

Although I rather suspect that these Khinasi nobles are dilettante wizards.
Imagine a character who is 2/3`s Aristocrat and 1/3 Wizard. Many of those
additional aristocrat skill ranks might be spent on Spellcraft, Knowledge
(Arcana), Concentration, Alchemy, and so forth. Take Omar ibn Tuarim
el-Zisef, who is described as a barely competant wizard. I think a 5th
level Arist/2nd Wiz makes more sense. A character like the Emira of
Khourane could be a 3rd level Arist/ 10th level Wiz.

This would conveniently conform to Gary`s counting only characters who wield
true magic, without forcing characters into the either/or of low adventuring
levels or high adventuring levels. It also reflects the Khinasi fascination
with magic without requiring that the only possible outlet of that
fascination is wizard class progression.

Kenneth Gauck
kgauck@mchsi.com


The Birthright Homepage: http://www.birthright.net
Birthright-l Archives: http://oracle.wizards.com/archives/birthright-l.html
To unsubscribe, send email to LISTSERV@ORACLE.WIZARDS.COM
with UNSUB BIRTHRIGHT-L in the body of the message.

On Thu, 12 Dec 2002, Peter Lubke wrote:

> On Thu, 2002-12-12 at 08:14, irdeggman wrote:
>
> While the character may rise and rise in levels, they may be unable to
> access higher level spells. Thus only strongly blooded characters may
> stick with wizardry for any time - others may quickly reach the limit of
> their potential.
>
> From a player perspective, none of this becomes a problem. After all,
> if a player wants to be a powerful wizard, any reasonable DM should
> allow him/her the resources to potentially achieve the dream.

And this is precisely the intent of my suggestion – the people who cause
me the big headaches in world design are all NPCs, not players. I want
there to be extra limits on spellcasters, because mid-level wizards are
just much more able to affect whole countries than even very high-level
fighters, so I am much more concerned with limiting their number. PCs are
supposed to change the world by their actions, but too many people with
high-level spells running around somewhere out there off-camera seriously
destabilize the game world.

For players, obtaining a moderate bloodline at character creation is easy,
and I like the idea of wizards having to worry about hunting down
awnsheghlien to increase their powers, or wanting to become a source
holder even for a short while just to have another way to increase their
bloodline. I also believe in extra goodies for regent wizards – for
example, extra levels of spell effect and higher save DCs if casting
normal spells in a province where they have a source or a ley line – so I
am open to the idea of similar extra goodies based on bloodline.

I think the bloodline – regency – mebhaighl – magic power connection is
the heart of Birthright, and I like making rules tweaks to make the
relationship more obvious and potent in game effect, even at the
individual adventurer scale.

Ryan Caveney


The Birthright Homepage: http://www.birthright.net
Birthright-l Archives: http://oracle.wizards.com/archives/birthright-l.html
To unsubscribe, send email to LISTSERV@ORACLE.WIZARDS.COM
with UNSUB BIRTHRIGHT-L in the body of the message.

----- Original Message -----
From: “Michael Romes” <Archmage@T-ONLINE.DE>
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 1:19 PM

> Germanic Huns? The Huns were the ancestors of Hungary not Germany

The Hungarians are Magyars, a different pastoral invader of the 10th
century.

On the other hand the Huns during the 4th century began to take on many
Gothic tribes who found it better to ally with the great power moving
through their area than it was to try to oppose them. The Huns themselves
were probably a Turkic people whose origins are close to the Turkic homeland
to the north-west of China. The Hunnic confederacy under Attila was no
longer identifiably an enthic object, but was only a coallition of tribes
under the leadership of Attila. Certainly it included man Germans,
including the conquered Ostrogoths and some Visigoths. The Romans who
oppsed Attila were likewise largely German, although we call them Roman.

> Yes. Take the PS of Medoere for example. It states that only 5% of the
> population are nobles (both religious and secular) and only a handful of
> familys have blooded individuals, and no more than 20 (TWENTY!) people
> in the whole domain are blooded.

Surely this means twenty households. 20 people would mean something closer
to three or four families.

> Meaning only 20 people in Medoere could hope to become a wizard.
> Some other books state the same, that blooded characters are very, very
> rare.

I figure that there is a noble family for every level of a province. There
are 9 provincial levels in Medoere, so I would create 9 blooded families who
might be connected to guilds, temples, sources, or land. These families
might have three generations and number four or more children in each
generation. Of course some of these blooded individuals could be
unconnected to holdings, and just adventuring types. The Enlien line alone
identifies seven living family members who can all be supposed to be blooded
(except maybe Saliene). If Suris, her brother Mourtien, or either of her
two cousins marries some scion and has children, the numbers of blooded
characters in Medoere grows further. If the Enlien family was totally
representative, I`d say there are 50 blooded characters in Enlien.

Kenneth Gauck
kgauck@mchsi.com


The Birthright Homepage: http://www.birthright.net
Birthright-l Archives: http://oracle.wizards.com/archives/birthright-l.html
To unsubscribe, send email to LISTSERV@ORACLE.WIZARDS.COM
with UNSUB BIRTHRIGHT-L in the body of the message.

On Thu, 12 Dec 2002, Peter Lubke wrote:

> After all, we have human gods getting destroyed at Deismaar, yet their
> essence is distributed among all the beings of Cerilia somewhat
> indiscriminately – even the “god-less” elves. And even among those
> races with their own gods or pantheon of gods.

Yeah, this is weird. It strikes me as very wrong. IMO, each race ought
to have its own name for the derivations – for example, the goblins and
dwarves should have their own complete pantheons and say theirs come from
their race`s gods, who as Gary suggests may actually be the same
transcendental beings, just seen in different ways in different cultures.
I think the goblins, gnolls and orogs ought to view all non-Azrai
derivations as coming not from the power of his enemies, but rather from
his divine servants who are falsely left out of the stories the foolish
humans tell each other. Dwarves might call them by the names of rocks and
minerals (Iron, Gold, Granite, Coal, etc.; I have not worked out a
conversion table for this) and elves by the elements (some are easy,
like Masela = Water and Reynir = Earth).

Ideally, Deismaar should have included all those others as well
perhaps, and an each to his own with “new” gods inheriting all
previous mantles etc. But of course we`d still have a problem with
> those pesky elves.

Much of the alternate backstory and metaphysics I have created for my
interpretation of Cerilia has come from trying to explain this fact.
What we know about BR history from the rulebook I basically lump in with
the stuff in the Atlas and just say it comes from the overwhelmingly
humanocentric viewpoint of Chancellor Dosiere, who is not really reporting
history when he talks about Deismaar, but instead just giving one highly
mythologized version out of many. Since the Sidhelien are the only race
which has many (or any) members who are old enough to remember Deismaar,
it is my personal opinion that what they have to say about it ought to be
the most correct.

IMC, bloodlines existed before Deismaar, at least among the elves and
dragons. The elves call them by their elemental associations: Air, Water,
Fire, Earth, Light (aka Energy or Magic, for “Vorynn” and the Positive
Material Plane), Darkness (aka Entropy, for “Azrai” and the Negative
Material Plane), and Motion (for “Brenna” and the Ethereal and Astral
Planes). The very oldest elves with bloodlines actually are elementals,
some of whom have been wearing humanoid bodies so long they have basically
forgotten they havent always had them and dont strictly need them.

I agree with irdeggman that the Sidhelien, with their ability to move
easily over any terrain without leaving any trace (which, among other
things, implies that while running through brambles in the rain they never
tear their clothes or get mud on their shoes), innate magic powers,
agelessness etc. really seem more like spirits than living beings, and the
older and more powerful among them I treat exactly that way.

> On the other hand, theres no reason why elves cant have gods. Even
> if there are no elf priests with priestly powers equivalent to other
> races - there could still be priests (just not a priest class) - or
> the priest class might not be available to PCs. It`s possible that elf

gods are rarely worshiped and/or never intervene or grant spells etc.

IMC it is the reverse – many elves do have priestly powers (such as
healing and turning/destroying undead) because they are physical
manifestations of the power of nature itself. (As Ive said before, their basic rulebook description leads me to believe they derive their sustenance directly from mebhaighl.) They need no gods, and in fact know for a fact that none of things the other races worship actually exist as such: IMC, the seven famous beings who fought and died at Deismaar were extremely powerful dragons, who had presented themselves to humans, goblins, etc. as gods in order to gain followers to help them fight the last major draconic civil war, in which nearly all of them died. Then the priests who had learned from those dragons how to use the magic of the land needed some way to hang on to the social and political power they derived from administering the heirarchy the dragons had created to rule over their new minions, (or had been successfully brainwashed into thinking their patrons really were divine, and needed some way to explain to themselves why they still had their powers, as they had bought the lie that "Azrai" et al. provided the power, instead of just the skill to use power that was just lying around) so they invented the story that some of the famous humans who had led the human armies of the various dragon factions had not died horribly, but instead ascended to godhood. Purely fictitious, but very useful for maintaining their priests positions at
the top of the social pecking order and the peace of mind of the true
believers. They went on teaching their rituals of magic use just the way
they had been taught by the dragons – there are now and never were any
gods to grant spells; instead there are just a variety of different
rituals for controlling mebhaighl. Magicians and priests can do different
subsets of the whole thing with somewhat different methods, but only
elves, the surviving dragons and blooded wizards can actually do it all,
or really do any of it “right”.

At the end of the day - we have a land that is “divinely charged” with
the essence of human gods. It comes as no surprise that to tap this
reservoir of energy, a spark of the same essence is required within
the being attempting the controlling.

IMO, the power was always in the land, and in different amounts in people.
Stories of gods IMC are just fanciful attempts to explain a kind of
physical truth that most non-elves still just don`t understand.

> And lastly - is all blood somewhat similar? Could the essence be
> linked somehow to the oxygen-linking/carrying qualities of blood?

“Midichlorians” does sound a lot like “mitochondria”, doesn`t it? =)

Ryan Caveney


The Birthright Homepage: http://www.birthright.net
Birthright-l Archives: http://oracle.wizards.com/archives/birthright-l.html
To unsubscribe, send email to LISTSERV@ORACLE.WIZARDS.COM
with UNSUB BIRTHRIGHT-L in the body of the message.

On Thu, 12 Dec 2002, Kenneth Gauck wrote:

> Although I rather suspect that these Khinasi nobles are dilettante
> wizards. Imagine a character who is 2/3`s Aristocrat and 1/3 Wizard.

This would conveniently conform to Gary`s counting only characters who
> wield true magic, without forcing characters into the either/or of low
> adventuring levels or high adventuring levels. It also reflects the
> Khinasi fascination with magic without requiring that the only
> possible outlet of that fascination is wizard class progression.

Absolutely! Just a “Me too.”

Ryan Caveney


The Birthright Homepage: http://www.birthright.net
Birthright-l Archives: http://oracle.wizards.com/archives/birthright-l.html
To unsubscribe, send email to LISTSERV@ORACLE.WIZARDS.COM
with UNSUB BIRTHRIGHT-L in the body of the message.

----- Original Message -----
From: “Ryan B. Caveney” <ryanb@CYBERCOM.NET>
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 2:28 PM

> Also, while magicians still need material components
> IMC, blooded wizards do not.

Does their bloodline automatically act as a substitute for spell componants?
Do they need to take a feat to activate this power? Do you require the
replacement of a focus (perhaps a dynastic symbol) or a staff (as Gandalf)
to activate this blood power? Are some spells with particularly expensive
componants exempt?

> I also view training as a magician to not generalize well or directly
> to true wizardry – if a magician somehow gained a bloodline late in
> life […] would have to learn almost from scratch how to deal with it.

What about using the 3e mechanic of half caster levels?

Kenneth Gauck
kgauck@mchsi.com


The Birthright Homepage: http://www.birthright.net
Birthright-l Archives: http://oracle.wizards.com/archives/birthright-l.html
To unsubscribe, send email to LISTSERV@ORACLE.WIZARDS.COM
with UNSUB BIRTHRIGHT-L in the body of the message.

----- Original Message -----
From: “Ryan B. Caveney” <ryanb@CYBERCOM.NET>
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 2:54 PM

> I like the idea of wizards having to worry about hunting down
> awnsheghlien to increase their powers, or wanting to become a source
> holder even for a short while just to have another way to increase their
> bloodline.

I have given blooded PC`s bloodline bonuses for acting as a champion for a
realm (without any formal connections to the rulers). If great
(multi-adventure) opponants who threaten a specific realm are defeated, a
boost of several blood points seems appropriate. The land has rewarded the
hero. If a blooded opponant is defeated and blood theft occurs, there is no
additional gift of the land.

Kenneth Gauck
kgauck@mchsi.com


The Birthright Homepage: http://www.birthright.net
Birthright-l Archives: http://oracle.wizards.com/archives/birthright-l.html
To unsubscribe, send email to LISTSERV@ORACLE.WIZARDS.COM
with UNSUB BIRTHRIGHT-L in the body of the message.

On Thu, 12 Dec 2002, Kenneth Gauck wrote:

> If great (multi-adventure) opponants who threaten a specific realm are
> defeated, a boost of several blood points seems appropriate. The land
> has rewarded the hero.

I agree. For regents, since particularly bad resolutions of random events
can lose them RP and even blood points, so too should particularly good
ones gain them one or both.

Ryan Caveney


The Birthright Homepage: http://www.birthright.net
Birthright-l Archives: http://oracle.wizards.com/archives/birthright-l.html
To unsubscribe, send email to LISTSERV@ORACLE.WIZARDS.COM
with UNSUB BIRTHRIGHT-L in the body of the message.

On Thu, 12 Dec 2002, Kenneth Gauck wrote:

> From: “Ryan B. Caveney” <ryanb@CYBERCOM.NET>
> > Also, while magicians still need material components
> > IMC, blooded wizards do not.
>
> Does their bloodline automatically act as a substitute for spell
> componants?

Yes.

> Do they need to take a feat to activate this power?

No. It`s an extra class feature of gaining level one in Wizard. And
magicians (unblooded spellcasters of any kind, actually, including priests
and bards without bloodlines) cannot take this feat, nor Still or Silent
Spell. Doing magic without a bloodline is irreducibly difficult.

Do you require the replacement of a focus (perhaps a dynastic symbol)
or a staff (as Gandalf) to activate this blood power?

I hadnt thought about it, but I am inclined to say no. I imagine some wizards are first taught that way, but I dont think the prop is
essential. The magic is in their blood, so they shouldnt need anything outside their own bodies to do magic. I dont think Gandalf strictly
needed his staff either, any more than Thor needed Mjollnir to kill
giants – the tool just made him even better at it. In game terms, Id make Gandalfs staff do something like provide the benefits of Maximize or
Extend Spell without requiring him to expend extra levels from his daily
list. Doing low magic like a magician always requires props, but the true
wizard can in time learn to do true magic by will alone.

Are some spells with particularly expensive componants exempt?

Yes. However, such spells can be cast without the expense (or with
reduced expense), either by forgoing some number of caster levels` worth
of effect or by sacrificing hp (again, the magic is, almost literally, in
their blood). Regent wizards may use RP in place of expensive components,
if for some reason they find gold that hard to come by.

> > I also view training as a magician to not generalize well or directly
> > to true wizardry – if a magician somehow gained a bloodline late in
> > life […] would have to learn almost from scratch how to deal with it.
>
> What about using the 3e mechanic of half caster levels?

Yes, thats about right. A slow process of learning to use higher-level wizard spells ought to be incorporated, also -- a Magician 14 shouldnt be
able to learn Limited Wish the first day he has a bloodline. He needs to
start small, and learn a new way of interacting with mebhaighl, lest it
get out of control. I am tempted to say he should in fact become a Wizard
7 / Expert 7, but that seems too punitive. This is why I liked 2e
dual-and-multi-classing`s use of separate XP tracks: in this case, gaining
those first few levels in the new class ought to be really easy.

What I might like better is perhaps to say that on day one the Magician
14 ought to become a Magician 13 / Wizard 1, and as he works his way
through some number of XP he gradually changes to M12/W2, then M11/W3 and
so on until he becomes entirely a wizard. Maybe this happens on the day
he becomes a 15th-level character, or maybe it takes much shorter or
longer, but I would say that some process of relearning ought to take
place either in place of or alongside the usual XP progression.

Ryan Caveney


The Birthright Homepage: http://www.birthright.net
Birthright-l Archives: http://oracle.wizards.com/archives/birthright-l.html
To unsubscribe, send email to LISTSERV@ORACLE.WIZARDS.COM
with UNSUB BIRTHRIGHT-L in the body of the message.

On Thu, 12 Dec 2002, daniel mcsorley wrote:

> I didn`t say there were human wizards there, I said 300,000 men.

I think that`s probably pretty reasonable.

> Whether elves are sorcerors or wizards (in 3e) is a matter of taste.

Agreed.

> I say there are no sorcerors in BR, just wizards,

Agreed.

> but its not germane anyway, because were talking about humans,
> /after/ Deismaar.

Agreed.

> > no more than 20 (TWENTY!) people in the whole domain are blooded.
> Sounds low- it doesn`t fit with the demographics.

Agreed.

Even if the blooded only married each other the population would still
tend to grow.

Agreed.

Heck, they`d grow faster than the general population, because they end
> up wealthy, often have magical powers, and gain more access to
> clerical healing magic.

Agreed. OTOH, they`d also be more inclined to kill each other (or be
hunted down by awnsheghlien) for bloodtheft. Still, I agree that overall
their growth rate (birth rate minus death rate) would be higher.

They wouldn`t all be high bloodline, because it would tend to dilute over
> time, but there would be a lot of them.

If they were only marrying each other and occasionally spent RP to
increase bloodlines, the bloodlines would have tended to grow on average
(even if the very highest lines did slide towards the middle). Frequent
bloodtheft could drive it either way: if the winners of bloodtheft duels
tended to have higher bloodlines than the losers, average blood score
would go up; if winners started lower than losers, the average would go
down (slightly less quickly, since some blood points would be gained).

The existence of many tainted bloodlines and the well-known RW phenomena
of royal bastards and families rising up from the common folk over
generations to eventually become nobles imply to me that there has been a
great deal of outbreeding, which continues to this day, so I am inclined
to consider any blooded proportion much under the rulebooks 1% to be too low. PS Mudens figure of 0.1% is IMO the absolute lower limit.

> Say they average 1% growth per generation (rather low, medieval
> population growth was around .35% per year),

These figures dont mesh well if you use the RW rate for the commoners! 0.35% per year is a bit over 11% per 30-year generation. In the same 1500 years that the blooded grew 64%, the unblooded would have grown by 189,000%! Clearly there must be something else going on, or relatively there wouldnt be enough scions to fill all the regent jobs. Also, if
true, it might imply 300,000 at Deismaar is much too large a figure. But
we ought to remember that at its height ancient Rome was a city of at
least that many inhabitants, and many think it held a million or more, a
figure not seen again until the industrial revolution, some 1500 years
later. Perhaps a significant fraction of the population of Cerilia
perished at Deismaar or in its aftermath effects on society – and global
climate! – in order to enable continued moderately rapid growth since then.

Ryan Caveney


The Birthright Homepage: http://www.birthright.net
Birthright-l Archives: http://oracle.wizards.com/archives/birthright-l.html
To unsubscribe, send email to LISTSERV@ORACLE.WIZARDS.COM
with UNSUB BIRTHRIGHT-L in the body of the message.