On Sun, 3 May 1998, The Olesen’s wrote:
> If it were open free to the public (public school) he would have to pay
> more GBs for it. I offered him these choices:
> Pay for all costs: Any class (as in social class) may go there
> Pay 1/2 costs: Middle class and up only
> Pay only minimal costs: Rich Middle and Upper only
If we want to be realistic, the concept of a “free public education” is
really a new thing. In the medieval type setting in Birthright, it would
have been unheard of. While there are great benefits to a public
education, increased literacy, and the like, there are also some distinct
drawbacks. People who can read typically start reading things that the
government would really not have them read. When the university
professors are writing treatises on the injustice of a totalitarian state
and no one can read them, except for a few other professors who can agree
and pat the author on the back, then there is little danger. If things
get rolling along too well, a few well placed executions, and things
settle down for another generation or so. However, when the masses can
read these writings and start buying into them, it gets very hard to
control your government.
I would lean toward the idea that a univeristy education is for the high
middle and upper classes only. It should be quite expensive and very time
consuming. Getting an education requires a large amount of leisure time.
By that I mean that you cannot be worried about being attacked by orogs,
or even partcipating in the gathering of food. It is very much an
aristocratic endeavor.
> Maybee it makes more people literate?
A university does very little for the literacy rate. Elementary schools
raise the literacy rate, well at least in theory. Universities contribute
the creation of the philosophical ideas needed to advance the
civilization. Things like mathematics, physics, chemistry, literature,
political thought, historical analysis, the development of business and
economic theory, medicine all happen at the university level. Do not
underestimate the impact of literature and mathematics on a society.
> Raises the average intelligence?
Not by a long shot. Think about how prevalent a college education is
today. Are the recipients of the knowledge any more intelligent? No.
Better informed? Hopefully. Better thinkers? If we are lucky.
> Increases sucess of attendants (better jobs)?
That is a distinct possibility. As a case in point, one of the biggest
arguments presented in studying the history of man is so that we can
identify patterns of behavior that have occured in our history, and
hopefully avoid those patterns which led to harm, and repeat those
patterns that led to success. Hopefully, an educated ambassador would
make fewer mistakes than an uneducated one.
Also, we need to make a distinction between a college and a university.
The main emphasis of a college is instruction. The main emphasis of a
university is research. That is not to say that some research does not
occur at a college and that teaching does not occur at a university. The
bardic colleges are more interested in teaching folks how to be good bards
than they are with the creation of a new bardic knowledge or the
development of socio-political theories on the impact of bards on society.
A univeristy during this time would be training the best minds - i.e.
those who can afford it, if you are rich, you must be smart otherwise you
could have never amassed your fortune - in how to research and evaluate
new ideas. Early universities were a hot bed for the sciences, medicine,
and history.
I think that the university would be most beneficial in helping the
development of technology. Any domain action that centers on developing a
technolgy, improving the understanding of science and nature, making
better weapons of war, improving an acadmic skill of a regent, should all
get bonuses to their success roll, provided that your university has folks
working in that area. I also think that a university could add bonuses to
diplomatic actions, depending upon how you use the faculty of the
university as resources.
What items get bonuses largely depends upon the emphasis of your
university. If you develop a leading school in history, your diplomacy
actions should be much more likely to succeed. If you have a lot of
mathematics and science being investigated, then you will be more likely
to make technological improvements that advance society. Be careful that
you do not allow your regent to make a university that is great at
everything. It costs the state a great deal of money to hire the faculty,
and build the resources needed to make an exceptional department in a
university. Your university should start out with only one really good
department. As years pass, that department gets stronger, and becomes
even more famous. Then other people want to go to work at that university
just to be associated with the name, and eventually you start to grow
other really strong departments. It takes lots of time though.
Also realize that your university students are going to be the first to
start social change. Your regent must keep your eye on them and make sure
that they do not get out of hand. Young folks have a lot of energy and
not much wisdom. I am sorry, but it is true. University students usually
do things that they wind up regretting later in life. So, it may be very
likely that your university students may cause a riot from time to time
like we saw at Michigan State this past week. That does not mean that the
government should shut the university, or destroy the student rebels. It
does not mean that the government should not watch them closely either.
I could ramble on quite a bit more, but I think that I have given you a
lot to think about. Have fun with it. Make sure that your regenr’s
coffers get hit heavily on the construction of the university and then
continues to take fairly significant hits as he has to develop the
library, faculty, and staff of the place. Research is expensive and time
consuming, but it adds greatly to the society in the end.
Just my 2 GBs
Jonathan