And as interesting as real-world lines of succession worked, keep in mind that, arguably, the BR setting doesn’t have the same frame of reference.
- It’s hard to have a “legitimate” succession claim when the Imperial line had been a largely unbroken progression to begin with and therefore what counts as “legitimate” has never actually been established in a legalistic sense in the setting. So, basically, the argument isn’t really about which claim is legal - it’s about which one should be made legal by establishing precedent.
For instance, what happens when Avan decides to throw their lot in with Boeruine so long as Boeruine’s eldest daughter is married to the eldest Avan son? Now that they’ve “let Boeruine win” the succession fight, that has established a precedent. So, when all the Boeruine sons strangely die afterwards (or are perhaps never born to begin with), Avan suddenly stands to inherit the Iron Throne due to the eldest daughter being married to an Avan heir. All because Boeruine got what he wanted.
- It’s even harder to have a “legitimate” succession discussion when it’s entirely possible that, at any point, the bloodline jumped to an unrelated person upon someone’s death. I mean, are we arguing that the Duke of Boeruine is actually the direct lineal descendant of the first Duke (he might actually be, I don’t know)? Or is he the “bloodline descendant”, which, in this setting and under these magical rules, is specifically possible to be completely separate but also equally legitimate?
– Lord Crimson