I have read the entry for the White Witch in “Blood Enemies” several times, and I fail to understand why she is considered awnshagh. It seems as though any special power she possesses (other than standard blood abilities) come from her rings, and not from any bloodform. If she has no monstrous traits, why then is she considered awnshegh and not just a powerful blooded priestess, with a special connection to her goddess (as demonstrated by the ring she got as a present from Kriesha)? If she is indeed awnshegh, what is her blood-induced Form?
They don’t do a very good job of describing her, I think.
I think her form is simply that she is severely and totally ugly. She though really doesn’t have particularly many powers, and I tend to not really think of her ‘full-blown’ Awnshegh, but rather as an emerging one (though she is quite powerful).
As a note of Bloodform/Bloodtrait…I tend to think that these two powers and the forms they they produce are really simply mirror images of the creature transforming. The White Witch is a vile woman, who is as vain as she is evil. Her bloodform corresponds to her thus making her outside as her inside (and giving her some power in return).
If you pay attention to the themes within the Awnshegh within the Blood Enemies, you will generally note this type of relationship between form and personality.
At 01:09 PM 6/14/2004 +0200, anacreon wrote:
>I have read the entry for the White Witch in “Blood Enemies”
>several times, and I fail to understand why she is considered awnshagh. It
>seems as though any special power she possesses (other than standard blood
>abilities) come from her rings, and not from any bloodform. If she has no
>monstrous traits, why then is she considered awnshegh and not just a
>powerful blooded priestess, with a special connection to her goddess (as
>demonstrated by the ring she got as a present from Kriesha)? If she is
>indeed awnshegh, what is her blood-induced Form?
Her awnshegh transformation becomes a bit more obvious if one realizes that
she`s really a thirteen-year-old Khinasi boy. Her bloodform theme might
then be described as “old lady transsexual” and she is probably more
transformed than even the Gorgon…
Seriously, though, the WW is one of the more troublingly classified
awnsheghlien, not just because of her own status as a “major awnshegh” but
because of the implications of the character. She is, in fact, not just
considered an awnshegh, but she is lumped into the category of "Major
Awnsheghlien" (the chapter title of the BE section in which she appears)
where the Swordhawk, who would appear to be more transformed and a more
obvious candidate for that classification, is in the “Lesser Awnsheghlien”
chapter. Several others in the “Lesser Awnshegh” chapter would seem more
transformed than the WW.
Not only that, but she has blood abilities beyond the capacity of her
bloodline in the original BR system. Two minor, two major and a great
blood ability with a minor, 20 bloodline. If we assume the best possible
rolls on the old Table 12: Blood Ability Acquisition, at that bloodline
strength/score she could not have had more than a minor, one major and one
great–and that would be pretty unlikely; 10,000 to 1. It`s got to happen
sometime but still…
When it comes to the theme of her transformation, I would suggest that it
is based on her being the stereotypical “old witch.” She is “a hag” (lower
case “h”) in the BR sense of a monstrous creature of mythic proportion–not
necessarily similar to the one in the MM. There already is a Hag (upper
case “H”) in the BR pantheon of awnsheghlien, so I`m hesitant to use that
term (especially since The Hag would appear to be more like one of the
Gorgon sisters in the Greek mythology) but that`s pretty close to the
character`s theme in the more common mythology/folktales.
When it comes to the minor/major classification issue of awnsheghlien, I
don`t think anyone is really concerned about that but me… I did,
however, find a solution that I think works surprisingly well, and it aptly
describes the situation with the WW, so Ill reiterate it. Ive mentioned
a couple of times on the boards/list that I use a system of portraying
blood abilities using points (called BP) which allows for a lot of
customization of blood abilities and the effects of awn-/ersheghlien
transformation. In that system, there is a feat called "Major
Transformation" that gives the character another BP. It costs the
character since s/he then has more difficulty resisting the change into an
awnshegh (a Will save when levelling up) if they have the blood of Azrai,
but since many of them embrace that change its not such a problem for
them. Taking this feat is a voluntary act and represents the character
embracing his/er transformation. The WW is then lumped into the "Major
Awnsheghlien" category for no other reason than because she has taken this
feat, while lesser awnshegh (and ershegh) appear in their own chapter with
nothing more than a blurb because they have not.
When it comes to the unusual number and the power of the WW`s blood
abilities there is some text in the original BR rules for such creatures
that indicated that number and power of an awn-/ershegh`s blood abilities
are increased by their transformation. The WW`s unusual (impossible)
number of blood abilities for her bloodline score would appear to exemplify
this process. Unfortunately, there wasn`t much in the way of actual game
mechanical description for how that might work. It was, essentially, an ad
hoc process left entirely up to the discretion of the DM without any
guidelines whatsoever other than the other awnsheghlien character descriptions.
In a 3e/D20 update of the setting, however, we can use an “Awnshegh”
character class that handles the character`s development. If such a class
grants a Bonus BP and transformations (or some other method of increasing
blood abilities and reflecting the physical change) there is a game
mechanical way of articulating both the transformation that have taken
place and increasing the character`s blood abilities in a steady,
incremental way. Characters who take levels in the class in the BP System
get a Bonus BP every level, which can be used to improve existing blood
abilities, add new blood abilities, or it can be spent on getting an
additional Transformation effect. In that context, the transformation of
the White Witch is mostly a character whose Bonus BP from awnshegh levels
are dedicated to improving her existing blood abilities. If using such a
system to portray awnsheghlien, given the number and power of her blood
abilities she would seem to deserve the “major awnsheghlien” appellation.
I should also note that in the BP system there is some information on how a
scion of Azrai must actively resist the transformation into an awnshegh by
making a Will save when levelling up. It`s interesting (to me, at least)
to note that the WW has levels in a cleric character class that has the
fastest Will save progression, meaning that she could be “less transformed”
than other awnsheghlien because she has made the appropriate Will saves and
taken levels as a priest rather than being forced to take levels in the
awnshegh class. Since there is a feat to define what is meant by "major
awnsheghlien" one need not connect up that concept to the actual character
levels in the Awnshegh class.
A version of the awnshegh character class can be found in the birthright-l
archives at:
http://oracle.wizards.com/scripts/wa.exe?A2=ind0404D&L=birthright-l&P=R5083
or, if you prefer, in the birthright.net boards under the "Rhoubhe
Manslayer" thread at:
http://www.birthright.net/forums/index.php?act=ST&f=2&t=2528
Laters,
Gary
So will anyone take a stab at posting her 3.5 stats?
Every time I hear White Witch, I can only think of The Lion, The Witch, and the Wardrobe. 
There is an indelible imprint in my mind, I suppose that’s what comes of reading books over and over and over… :blink:
Osprey
At 03:22 AM 6/15/2004 +0200, Osprey wrote:
>So will anyone take a stab at posting her 3.5 stats?
>
>Every time I hear White Witch, I can only think of [i]The Lion, The Witch,
>and the Wardrobe.[/i] There is an indelible imprint in my mind, I
>suppose that`s what comes of reading books over and over and over… :blink:
I`m in the “Imprinted by C.S. Lewis at an Early Age” club too, not that
that`s such a bad thing…
Anyway, give me a while and I`ll take stab at her stats, using the Awnshegh
character class. I`ve avoided posting any of the existing awnsheghlien
using that system, but maybe it`s time to do so.
Gary
OK, folks, I`m going to start in on the White Witch conversion to 3e/D20,
but first I want to raise a couple of issues/get a few suggestions from the
good folks in the BR community.
Regarding Ability Scores: We don`t know from the original BR materials
what her 2e stats were other than that her intelligence which is given as
20 and her charisma is given as 9 (or 19 with her Ring of Beauty in
effect.) Strength, dexterity, constitution and wisdom are pretty much
unknown. As much as possible I like to start with the Standard Array for
ability scores, or scores that are close to those values when it comes to
the point buy method of character generation. Here are, however, a few
notes regarding how I plan to set her stats:
Strength. She avoids combat and wields only a dagger, so this will be her
lowest score. I`ll start it at 8 and possibly even give her a disadvantage
(from the awnshegh character class) to lower it a bit more. Since her
transformation theme is “haggish old witch” such a disadvantage is
thematically sensible.
Constitution. The WW has 45hp in BE. That`s very low for a character with
14 priest levels. The average hp for a 14th level priest would be 63 (2e
characters did not normally start with max hp at 1st level.) That would
imply a penalty in her constitution score. In addition to the information
in the character description that indicates the WW avoids physical
confrontation there`s plenty of evidence to indicate that this is one of
her lower stats, so again I`m thinking I should start it off at 8 and maybe
even give her a disadvantage to lower it to 6 if it makes sense.
Dexterity. This one is weird because in BE her AC changes with her
transformation between crone (AC 3) and beauty (AC 6) but there`s no
indication that her dexterity is changed by the magic item that changes her
physical appearance and Cha stat. When the character uses that magic item,
however, it appears to be the only change. She might be donning and
doffing some sort of armor, but why would she, and why wouldn`t that be
described in some way? Because this transformation is not due to her
bloodline/awnshegh status, however, I`m thinking it might make sense to
assign that effect to the Ring of Beauty description instead. It would
help balance the power of that magic item if it were “cursed” in some way
in addition to the lawful good/nicey-nicey way it forces the wearer to
behave. Comments?
Intelligence. As noted, this stat is at 20 in the BE entry. In 2e, of
course, ability scores only had bonuses at either ends of the scale
(starting at 15) so in 3e we can let this slide a bit. It is one of her
higher stats, and her “financial genius” is featured pretty prominently in
the character description, so it will be high in this version as well. The
WW does, however, have the Heightened Ability blood ability, and we don`t
know if that affects her intelligence or charisma since it could affect
either in the original 2e version of BR. I`m probably going to put her
intelligence at 14 using the standard array/point buy method of character
generation, give her a point or two bump for levelling up, and assume her
blood ability is pushing it up the rest of the way.
Wisdom. The only way I can see to gauge the WW`s wisdom score is by the
number of bonus spells she is granted amongst her list of spells in
BE. Unfortunately, the list of spells would seem be impossible for a 14th
level 2e priest with any wisdom score. Among those in that character
description are ten 1st, eight 2nd, eight 3rd, eight 4th, five 5th, three
6th and two 7th level spells or 10, 8, 8, 8, 5, 3, 2. The spells for a
14th level priest in 2e were 6, 6, 6, 5, 3, 2, 1, so she`s got 4, 2, 2, 3,
2, 1, 1 bonus spells. There is no 2e wisdom score that grants that number
of bonus spells. It`s off on at least a couple of those levels. In order
to get ten 1st level spells she`d have to have a wisdom score of at least
23, but to get that second 7th level spell it`d have to be at least 25. At
25 wisdom, however, shed get three 6th level bonus spells. Theres no
real rhyme or reason to it that I can discern.
Nonetheless, the WW is a priest, so her wisdom score should be high. Since
she gets scads of bonus spells for a 2e priest it would appear to be higher
than her intelligence score, so that will be her highest starting ability
score, and raising it will be the focus of her transformation effects.
Charisma. This stat is given as 9 with a magic item that grants what would
probably be called a +10 “inherit” bonus in 3e/D20. Is there any
particular reason to change that?
Regarding Character Levels: As I mentioned I`m going to portray her using
an Awnshegh character class. I`m hoping not to push her over 20 character
levels, however. She is a 14th level priest in 2e BR, and that was the
“magic number” for 2e priests since the major characteristic of that class
that it gets her access to 7th level spells–the 2e maximum divine spell
level. In 3e clerics get access to 7th level spells at 13th level,
however, so it might make sense to shift her down a notch.
Regarding Bloodline Score: The WW`s bloodline strength/score is very low,
especially for a character with a realm as large as hers. Im not
planning on changing her score drastically, but if I added a point or two
would anybody mind?
Any objections or comments regarding these other issues in translating the
White Witch into D20?
TIA for your input,
Gary
Originally posted by geeman@Jun 15 2004, 07:40 AM
Dexterity. This one is weird because in BE her AC changes with her transformation between crone (AC 3) and beauty (AC 6) but theres no indication that her dexterity is changed by the magic item that changes her physical appearance and Cha stat. When the character uses that magic item, however, it appears to be the only change. She might be donning and doffing some sort of armor, but why would she, and why wouldnt that be described in some way? Because this transformation is not due to her bloodline/awnshegh status, however, I`m thinking it might make sense to assign that effect to the Ring of Beauty description instead. It would help balance the power of that magic item if it were “cursed” in some way in addition to the lawful good/nicey-nicey way it forces the wearer to behave. Comments?
I think it is more logical to assume that the White Witch possesses a ring of protection +3, that she has to take off whenever she dons her ring of charisma (remember that in 2nd ed AC, the lower the better).
While we’re on the subject of the ring, if the ring makes the wearer Lawful Good, how con a lawful good person give it up, knowing that doing so will make her evil? I mean, if you’re lawful good, why on earth would you do something just for the sake of enabling you to lie cheat and steal?
Gary,
It sounds to me like the Ring of Beauty affects a physical transformation similar to an Alter Self spell.
For AC, I would assume that the WW’s Natural Armor she gets from being a hag is lost while in the form of a soft, beautiful woman…however, her Dex might also be better when not old and withered, so perhaps these stats:
Hag, AC 17: Dex 8, +6 Natural Amor, +2 Deflection
Beauty, AC 14: Dex 14, +0 natural armor, +2 Deflection
Then assume she wears a +2 Ring of Protection, or maybe has Protection from Good as a major blood ability of Azrai, which would give her +2 Deflection AC against good-aligned characters at least.
Anyways, these would give her equivalent 3.x AC stats to the original.
I think natural Armor being part of her true form makes sense - the price of beauty [from the ring] is the softness of that form, so vulnerable… 
Otherwise, I think the low Strength and Con make great sense, as does the low Charisma…although I think even ugly people can be charismatic when they wield great power. Which means the WW must be REALLY UGLY and repulsive as a crone. I would add some serious disadvatages, not just ugly: foul-smelling, ill-kempt, curled and haggard, always a cruel sneer to her lips, a strand of spittle hanging or flying from her protruding lip…[yummy]
If you’re gonna do ugly, take it all the way, baby! Full throttle to REPULSIVE!!! :o
A straight conversion of 2e to 3e would give the WW an Int of 22 (+6 modifier). I would translate “financial genius” into the Master Administrator feat, along with a maxed Administrate skill.
So what’s the WW a Cleric of? Kreisha? Azrai? Erik? Laerme? The Cold Rider?
Domains: Charm? Winter? ???
Not sure what to tell you for what her Wisdom score should be.
However, giving her a Periapt of Wisdom +4 or +6 might help explain a super-high Wisdom score for bonus spells, without it needing to be a permanent stat. Might be a good choice in this case. A natural Wisdom of 20, with +6 enhancement bonus [26], seems more reasonable and believable for this level character.
Also, there’s always the chance of inherent bonuses from finding a Tome of Understanding or similar work. [Though what 17th+ level spellcaster would blow the XP for making one of these puppies for someone else is beyond me…]
I’d be opposed to her Wisdom being raised with blood abilities - this seems somewhat opposed to Azrai’s bloodline, whereas Intelligence and Charisma are the favored traits.
Some other ideas:
Give her [Greater] Spell Focus: Necromancy, not for the undead-raising aspects but rather to raise the DC’s on her Bestow Curse spells, and secondarily on Inflict spells. (It’s a pity we can’t adopt the Ravenloft cursing system here). I see the “Curse of the White Witch” being an appropriate tool of fear and legend to deal with her rivals and those who displease her.
Some ideas, anyways.
Osprey
At 07:53 AM 6/15/2004 +0200, anacreon wrote:
> I think it is more logical to assume that the White Witch possesses a
> ring of protection +3, that she has to take off whenever she dons her
> ring of charisma
That is much better. Kudos.
>While we`re on the subject of the ring, if the ring makes the wearer
Lawful Good, how con a lawful good person give it up, knowing that doing
so will make her evil? I mean, if you`re lawful good, why on earth would
>you do something just for the sake of enabling you to lie cheat and steal?
I don`t think the lawful good aspect is really an alignment change per se,
but meant to reflect the ring`s magical effect. The description of the
ring does say that the wearer is aware of the personality change, which is
sometimes not the case with items that are “cursed” or otherwise affecting
the alignment or personality of the character, and this is not that kind of
effect. Rather, it just requires a certain type of behavior while
functioning, the idea being that lies, deceit, etc. are not
“beautiful.” (“Truth is beauty, beauty is truth.”) Thematically, if one
is going to do something “ugly” then the ring has to be removed.
Gary
At 09:16 AM 6/15/2004 +0200, Osprey wrote:
> So what`s the WW a Cleric of? Kreisha? Azrai? Erik? Laerme? The Cold Rider?
Domains: Charm? Winter? ???
She`s a priestess of Karesha. For her domains charm sure sounds like it
would make sense for the character…
> Not sure what to tell you for what her Wisdom score should be.
> However, giving her a Periapt of Wisdom +4 or +6 might help explain a
> super-high Wisdom score for bonus spells, without it needing to be a
> permanent stat. Might be a good choice in this case. A natural Wisdom
> of 20, with +6 enhancement bonus [26], seems more reasonable and
> believable for this level character.
>
> Also, there`s always the chance of inherent bonuses from finding a Tome
of Understanding or similar work. [Though what 17th+ level spellcaster
would blow the XP for making one of these puppies for someone else is
beyond me…]
I`d be opposed to her Wisdom being raised with blood abilities - this
> seems somewhat opposed to Azrai`s bloodline, whereas Intelligence and
Charisma are the favored traits.
One of the things a character can do with the Awnshegh/Ershegh character
class is raise any ability score regardless of derivation. Since the theme
of the characters can be so broad I wrote it up to make for any possibility
and, in fact, made even the regular Heightened Ability blood ability
possibly effect any ability score at the DM`s discretion and/or after the
ones suggested by the original BR materials had been addressed. On the
whole ability scores are so general a thing that it seems like the blood of
the gods should be able to influence just about any of them in some
way. At least, for the purposes of the more general BR
gods/derivations. One should remain “on theme” of course, but given that
anything should be possible.
I will definitely keep in mind that her wisdom score might be improved by
magic items, however. That seems to be particularly apt given the
character description that says specifically that she has something of a
hoard of them. (That`s not unusual for some of the major awnshegh, though
it is unusual for BR in general.)
Give her [Greater] Spell Focus: Necromancy, not for the undead-raising
aspects but rather to raise the DC`s on her Bestow Curse spells, and
> secondarily on Inflict spells. (Its a pity we cant adopt the Ravenloft
> cursing system here). I see the “Curse of the White Witch”
> being an appropriate tool of fear and legend to deal with her rivals and
> those who displease her.
Interesting. I think you`re right, there definitely should be a curse
function going on. Out of curiosity, does this seem like something that
should be a function of her bloodline or of her character levels?
Gary
Ok much like the person that started the post I do not see the white witch as and anshe she is an evil tyrant with azrais blood that changes her appearance and may be veiwed by the people of cerilia as a anshe.
She is not an anshe as she has no bloodform ability.
People have pointed out that she has to meny spells and blood abilitys but this is easily explained as their are spells and magic items that can increase both the number of spells and the number or strength of your bloodabilitys.
Also it does not say how meny spells she knows it tells you what spells she often recieves much like the mages spells known.
Also the white witch has average human charisma and most of her uglyness comes from the fact that she is very old. When she uses magic she often makes herself appear as she was when she was young.
At 12:55 PM 6/15/2004 +0200, Graham Anderson wrote:
> She is not an anshe as she has no bloodform ability.
Interestingly enough, in the character descriptions for the awnsheghlien in
BE there are many that do not have the Bloodform blood ability. Becoming
an ersheghlien would appear to require having Bloodtrait, but awnshegh do
not appear to need the Bloodform blood ability.
> People have pointed out that she has to meny spells and blood abilitys
> but this is easily explained as their are spells and magic items that can
> increase both the number of spells and the number or strength of your
> bloodabilitys.
A couple of magic items might explain her spell list…
> Also it does not say how meny spells she knows it tells you what spells
> she often recieves much like the mages spells known.
That may be, though it would be something of a departure from the way they
typically list spells in character descriptions in 2e.
Gary
Interestingly enough, in the character descriptions for the awnsheghlien in
BE there are many that do not have the Bloodform blood ability. Becoming
an ersheghlien would appear to require having Bloodtrait, but awnshegh do
not appear to need the Bloodform blood ability
The hydra, kraken , leviathan, the minotaur, magian, siren, wolf
these are the ones along with the white witch that do not have bloodform but they have not changed their form the hydra is still a crocodile the kraken still a kraken etc. The only exception is the minotaur and there is nothing known for sure about him so he may not have changed his form either or he may have had is form changed by magic and not the blood.
These are powerfull and dangerous creatures with bloodlines but not anshe as they have no bloodform. They are however veiwed as anshe by most try telling the brechts that the kraken isn’t an anshe.
At 02:42 PM 6/15/2004 +0200, graham anderson wrote:
>
Interestingly enough, in the character descriptions for the
> awnsheghlien in
> BE there are many that do not have the Bloodform blood ability. Becoming
> an ersheghlien would appear to require having Bloodtrait, but awnshegh do
> not appear to need the Bloodform blood ability
>
> The hydra, kraken , leviathan, the minotaur, magian, siren, wolf
>
>these are the ones along with the white witch that do not have bloodform
>but they have not changed their form the hydra is still a crocodile the
>kraken still a kraken etc. The only exception is the minotaur and there is
>nothing known for sure about him so he may not have changed his form
>either or he may have had is form changed by magic and not the blood.
Apocolypse and the Harpy also do not have the Bloodform blood ability and
are listed amongst the “major awnsheghlien” chapter of BE.
Regardless of that, however, several of those characters are transformed
pretty significantly from standard creatures, often more than other
characters who do have the Bloodform blood ability. The Boar, for
instance, has the Bloodform blood ability but isn`t particularly more
transformed then the Wolf (who does not) is. The circumstances of the
Chimaera`s transformation (who has Bloodform) are as unusual as that of the
Harpy (who does not.) Rhoubhe Manslayer and the Raven are not as
transformed as are most of the other awnsheghlien despite the fact that
they have the bloodform blood ability.
>These are powerfull and dangerous creatures with bloodlines but not anshe
>as they have no bloodform. They are however veiwed as anshe by most try
>telling the brechts that the kraken isn`t an anshe.
There is a lot of material in BR that purposefully conveys a mistaken or
otherwise coloured POV, but I don`t think the classification of ten of the
twenty-five main characters in the BE text as major awnsheghlien is one of
them. I seriously doubt that it was the intent of the authors to make
these characters exceptional versions of standard monsters with a
bloodline, or that that interpretation really suits the setting very
much. Using 3e/D20 it is easier to reinterpret these creatures in ways
that do not require an awnshegh transformation. They might be dire
animals, a template applied, or in some cases simply have their HD
advanced, but that was pretty much the case before 3e came out as
well. One could always write up unique monsters and assign them values in
ways that had nothing to do with bloodline or any campaign specific
material. Given that awnsheghlien are such a central focus of the campaign
setting it seems like a waste to reinterpret such a large portion of the
iconic creatures of the BR campaign setting into advanced, but otherwise
standard D&D monsters.
Gary
I forgot about the harpy and appocalypse it explains about the harpy in her background and again nobody realy knows about the appocalypse.
I don’t think you can be a anshe without bloodform that is the point of the ability.
Regardless of that, however, several of those characters are transformed
pretty significantly from standard creatures, often more than other
characters who do have the Bloodform blood ability. The Boar, for
instance, has the Bloodform blood ability but isnt particularly more transformed then the Wolf (who does not) is. The circumstances of the Chimaeras transformation (who has Bloodform) are as unusual as that of the
Harpy (who does not.) Rhoubhe Manslayer and the Raven are not as
transformed as are most of the other awnsheghlien despite the fact that
they have the bloodform blood ability
The boar is far more transformed than the wolf the wolf has some blood abilitys but not bloodform and is still a wolf.
Rhoubhe Manslayer and the Raven have changed through bloodform and the changes are not just physical but mental with rhoubhe being lawfull. They have both changed though while the kraken etc have not.
There is a lot of material in BR that purposefully conveys a mistaken or
otherwise coloured POV, but I don`t think the classification of ten of the
twenty-five main characters in the BE text as major awnsheghlien is one of
them. I seriously doubt that it was the intent of the authors to make
these characters exceptional versions of standard monsters with a
bloodline, or that that interpretation really suits the setting very
much. Using 3e/D20 it is easier to reinterpret these creatures in ways
that do not require an awnshegh transformation. They might be dire
animals, a template applied, or in some cases simply have their HD
advanced, but that was pretty much the case before 3e came out as
well. One could always write up unique monsters and assign them values in
ways that had nothing to do with bloodline or any campaign specific
material. Given that awnsheghlien are such a central focus of the campaign
setting it seems like a waste to reinterpret such a large portion of the
iconic creatures of the BR campaign setting into advanced, but otherwise
standard D&D monsters.
I think it was intended for them not to be anshe but remember that the people of cerilia don’t know things like what blood abilitys they have. These beings are different and exceptional so the people view them as anshe. An anshe is someone that has been changed by bloodform into soemthing else than the original. Anshe is also an elven word and may be understood diferently by elves and the humans.
When it comes to these figures they are powerfull usualy landed and are the figures that you are going to be going against in the game they have been put in the book as adversarys.
I don’t see it as reinterpreting them as not anshe they wern’t anshe to begin with but they are good adversarys.
thats my opinion anyway.
Regarding the WWs rings and other magic items, heres what I`m thinking so
far:
Wintering: This magical ring was a gift direct from the White Witch`s
patron, Karesha. It is a minor artifact that renders the wearer immune to
cold-based damage and allows the wearer to use the following spell-like
abilities as standard actions:
- Freezing Sphere (at will.) This power is the equivalent of a Flaming
Sphere spell with the energy type changed to cold.
-
Ice Storm (3/day.)
-
Call Blizzard (1/week.) This power is equivalent to the Control
Weather spell`s blizzard effect.
Strong abjuration and evocation; CL 12th
The BE entry for this ring would appear to allow the wearer to cast the
equivalent of a cold-based Fireball spell at will. There is, at least, no
number of times per day that ability can be used listed in the item
description. A 10d6 icy explosion at will seems pretty over-the-top to me
for a 3e magic item, especially since the ring also has the Ice Storm
ability with is very similar and that is limited to 3/day, so I think
reducing the ability to a the equivalent of Flaming Sphere is prudent.
CL 12th is kind of low for a minor artifact, but that is how it is
described in BE. It can`t really hurt to raise it given that the spell
effects aren`t drastically altered in a 3e format other than range. Any
objections or comments on that?
Ring of Beauty: When the White Witch dons her ring of beauty she is
physically transformed (equivalent to Alter Self) into a youthful and
beautiful woman. In addition, the ring of beauty grants her a +10
enhancement bonus to her charisma. As a side effect, the wearer must at
all times behave in a lawful and good manner while wearing the ring. Any
attempt to lie, cheat, steal or otherwise deceive while wearing the ring of
beauty is impossible (no use of bluff skill and -20 penalty to diplomacy
checks made to negotiate.) No actions can be performed to harm another
person that are not in self-defense.
Strong transmutation; CL 12th
In 3e/D20 terms, I think the ring of beauty should also be considered a
minor artifact. At least, that +10 to charisma is pretty much beyond
“standard” magic items. As far as the specifics of the wearer`s behavior
and the game mechanical effects are concerned is there anything other than
an inability to bluff and a penalty to diplomatic negotiation checks that
should be used in a 3e version of that ring?
Again, CL 12th is rather low for a minor artifact.
I`m planning on giving the WW a periapt of wisdom +4 and an additional ring
of protection +3 to wear when she removes her ring of beauty. I`ll
probably give her some sort of magical dagger with a special power as her
“hold out” weapon, but I haven`t decided specifically what that will
be. She`ll also have bracers of armor +4 (or so.)
Shell have an assortment of potions and scrolls, most of which Im not
really planning on listing individually other than to note that she will
often have several of a few specific types available at any given time.
The WW is supposed to have a large assortment of magic items, at least a
few of which intimidate her neighbors. Any ideas on what those might
be? Items that store or recall cast spells might explain her rather odd
spell list in the BE entry (particularly 5th level spells) though I don`t
think anyone would be unusually intimidated by such a thing…
Thoughts?
Gary
I don’t think that the ring should give you a +10 to cha it changes who you are giving you a 19cha
I think that it should be that if someone puts it on they get 19 cha whatever there cha is.
As for magic items , A magic item that replicates a blood ability, A magic item that summons a ice elemental like the ice giants ability, an orb of winter enabling her to prunge another land into an extended winter. These are just a few ideas I hope they help.
At 02:00 PM 6/16/2004 +0200, graham anderson wrote:
> I don`t think that the ring should give you a +10 to cha it changes who
you are giving you a 19chaI think that it should be that if someone puts
it on they get 19 cha whatever there cha is.
That`s interesting. Generally, in 3e/D20 they did away with the function
of some 2e magic items that simply set an ability score value (like girdles
of giant strength or gauntlets of ogre power) rather than provided a bonus
to that stat. I`m not opposed to going against that trend for a magic item
of this type since it does, as you note, have a kind of broader
implication what with its alignment change and the way that works. Im
curious, however, what would happen in this particular interpretation if a
character who had a 20+ charisma put on that ring? Would their stat be
“replaced” by the lawful good/19 charisma personality imposed on them by
the ring or would their higher stat prevail?
>As for magic items , A magic item that replicates a blood ability, A magic
>item that summons a ice elemental like the ice giants ability, an orb of
>winter enabling her to prunge another land into an extended winter. These
>are just a few ideas I hope they help.
Yeah, she should have at least one of those items in her inventory…
Gary
The Orb of Winter’s Fury.
I like it.
It could be a “winterized” version of an Orb of Storms, really, or could even be an orb of storms, just typically used by the WW for wintry purposes up in the cold northern wilds. You could also allow it to cast Winter’s Fury (realm spell, see Raesene’s revised Ch 7 section for details) once per year without the WW paying RP/GB or needing a temple to do so…that would be fun.
Along similar lines, what about an artifact that would let her cast Blight lands as a Court Action once a season or once a year? Rod of the Blight? Kind of an opposite to the Staff of Prosperity, though I’d up its power a bit. This adds a domain-level Cursing effect, which IS definitely a very real (an appropriate) threat to hold over one’s neighbors. Especially if the item acts as its own level 1 temple, allowing the spell to be cast wherever the rod is. Now that sounds like a fine tool for the witch’s arsenal.
I like the ring granting 19 Charisma. though by 3e stats, I’d make it an even number, otherwise it’s kinda silly. 20 charisma is the 3e equivalent of 19 in 2e, so I’d go with that. But granting a flat 20 Charisma, with the LG stipulations, seems cool and unique and I’d go with it.
When making singular items, you are essentially creating artifacts, and these are somewhat ad hoc anyways, so don’t worry too much about precedent in standard magic items. Also, by having the ring grant a set charisma, you avoid it being equated to an epic magic item.
Nonetheless, granting 20 Charisma is powerful. I’d make the Caster Level 15th-20th level. After all, the WW didn’t make the ring herself, if she could she wouln’t have made the LG limitation! If it’s really an artifact. I’d make the caster level 20th. This makes it more inaccessible for anyone even trying to make one themselves (whether the DM would allow it or not is a different issue), and most importantly makes it more resistant to dispelling, damage, and cancellation. i.e., more survivable as an item.
Osprey
I like those idea osprey how about something that shows her more insideous nature something with an effect like the realm spells subversion, demagogue.
Or maybe an other effect of the orb of winters fury. similar to the warding spell it summons a snow storm trapping any units in the province and preventing units from entering it. Or another item.