3E info for Wemic's wanted

Expansions Empires of Blood
1

I’m looking for 3E stats for Wermics. I know they were features in Races of Faerun, but I have no intention of buying an entire book for a single monster description, so I was wondering if anyone could summarise their info.

I’m especially looking for their abilities, and character type info (ability scores, feats, skills, etc). I’m trying to decide if they can become a PC race for Aduria or not. So if anyone can help me out, either e-mail directly at hoss@chariot.net.au or post the information here.

Also information on Gnolls may be useful as well, but I should be able to come up with something based on their stats in the MM.

… more on Aduria soon.

2

I’ll dig it out for you by tomorrow.

3

Wemics

+8 Str, +2 Dex, +2 Con, -2 Cha
5d8 racial hit dice (BAB +5, Fort +1, Ref +4, Will +4)
Starts with (2+Int)x8 skill points (class skills: Hide, Jump, Listen, Move Silently, Spot, Wilderness Lore) and 2 feats courtesy of hit dice (normal selection is alertness and great fortitude)
Large size (-1 attack and AC, -4 on hide checks, +4 grapple, larger weapons and equipment)
Facing 10 feet (10x5 in old notation), reach 5
Speed 40 feet
Darkvision 60 feet
+4 natural armor
Proficiency with simple weapons and shields
+8 racial bonus on jump checks
Natural weapons (2 claws 1d6) - can attack with a weapon and make a secondary claw attack at -5 with half Str bonus on damage
Level Adjustment: +3
Total ECL: 8

I could convert them to a savage species monster class format if you like - that should make them more playable in most campaigns.

4

Thanks, that is very useful, although I’m still not certain if Wermics make a good PC race, I may put them in as an option, given that people like choices. In SS format might be useful, although I haven’t seen that book yet (may buy it eventually if it looks like being useful).

One of the major PC races will be the Gnoll though (long background as to why, not important right now). I can gleen a fair amount of their stats from the MM, as follows…

+4 Str, +2 Con, -2 Int, -2 Cha
Racial HD: 2d8 + con bonus (+1 BAB, +4 Fort)
Speed 30 ft
+1 natual AC
Darkvision 60ft
+3 racial bonus to listen and spot

ECL 2 or 3??

5

Gnolls are ECL 3 - they have 2 Hit Dice, and a +1 level adjustment for their stat bonuses and abilities.

Gnolls don’t actually have a racial bonus on listen or spot - that’s just how common gnolls spend their racial skill points. The MM method for determining skill points for monsters is fairly cumbersome: Gnolls are medium-size humanoids, and have 2 Hit Dice. Humanoids gain 6 + Int mod (-1 for gnolls) skill points, +1 per “extra hit dice”; medium-size creatures subtract 1 from their total number of hit dice to find extra hit dice (see MM p. 11 on the skill table); gnolls gain 2-1 extra skill points like this - i.e. a total of 6 skill points, distributed equally between listen and spot. I know that all sounds terribly complex, and I get a headache thinking about it sometimes myself - I think they were trying to keep monsters “different” from characters.

The upcoming revised edition will change that somewhat; gnolls will probably start with (2 + Int mod) x 4, plus 2 + Int mod skill points for their second hit dice - i.e. (2 + Int mod) x5 skill points total - the same format as characters. Since gnolls are stupid, it looks like they’ll lose a couple of skill points in the revision.

6

Ok, quick gander at gnolls in Savage Species format:

Racial Traits
+2 Str, -2 Int, -2 Cha
Darkvision 60 ft.
Speed 30 ft.

Class Features
Proficient with simple and martial weapons, light and medium armor, and shields.

Class skills: Listen, Spot - Intimidate, Wilderness Lore, and Search also seem appropriate.

Level 1
HD 1d8
BAB +0
Fort +2
Ref +0
Will +0
Skill Points (2 + Int mod) x4
Special: +1 natural armor

Level 2
HD 2d8
BAB +1
Fort +3
Ref +0
Will +0
Skill Points 2 + Int mod
Special: +2 Con

Level 3
HD 2d8
BAB +1
Fort +3
Ref +0
Will +0
Skill Points 2 + Int mod
Special: +2 Str

This kind of progression allows them to take their ECLs as actual levels instead, which means you can start as a 1st-level gnoll, for instance.

It might be a good idea to add a couple of little goodies to the gnoll to make them a bit better - scent and perhaps a +2 racial bonus on intimidate comes to mind as good choices (they’re actually less scary than halflings, given their charisma penalty).

7

> This kind of progression allows them to take their ECLs as actual levels instead, which means you can start as a 1st-level gnoll, for instance.
>
> It might be a good idea to add a couple of little goodies to the gnoll to make them a bit better - scent and perhaps a +2 racial bonus on intimidate comes to mind as good choices (they`re actually less scary than halflings, given their charisma penalty).

I think assigning this gnoll an ECL 3 is extremely harsh, even with adding
“a couple of little goodies.” Compare this Gnoll with a 3rd level
Dwarven(PHB) fighter:

ECL 3 Gnoll
+2 Str -2 Int -2 Chr
Darkvision
+2 Str
+2 Con
+1 natural armor
HD 2d8
BAB +1
Fort +3
Refl +0
Will +0
Skill Points: (2+Int) * 6
Proficiencies: Simple weapons, martial weapons, light armor, medium armor,
shields.

The dwarf gains the +2 Con and -2 Chr, already an unbalanced ability score
adjustment according to the DMG. This is actually much better that the
gnoll strength adjustment above (at 1st level) which looks balanced at first
glance. The dwarf is slightly slower at only 20 feet; I`d argue that this
makes up for the abiltiy score adjustment.

Both recieve darkvision. Your Gnoll gets +1 natural armor, whereas the
dwarf gets a +4 dodge bonus against giants and a +1 to hit a particular type
of enemy. I think we could say these benefits are on par. (Im emphasising the strongest possible case for the Gnoll here; I actually think youd need
+2 natural armor bonus to equal +4 vs giants and +1 to hit goblins, but just
for arguments sake, lets continue.)

As a third level fighter, this dwarven fighter gets +3 BAB, +3 Fort, +1
Refl, +1 Will, two bonus feats, and ([2*int]*6) skill points. I think the
gnoll has a better selection of class skills, but the fighter gets
proficiency in heavy armor.

Gnoll Advantages (over Fighter-3):
+4 Str (+2 to hit and damage and athletic skills)
moves at 10 feet faster than a dwarf

Dwarven Fighter(3) Advantages:
Doesn`t have the -2 Int
d10 hit dice instead of d8
An additional hit die
An additional +2 BAB
An additional +1 to Reflex and Will saves
A multitude of other, less relavent, advantages including exclusive
right to Weapon Specialization, bonuses to saves against poison and spell
effects, and quite a few skill checks.

Dwarven Fighter(2) Advantages:
Doesn`t have the -2 Int
d10 hit dice instead of d8
An additional +1 BAB
A multitude of other, less relavent, advantages including exclusive
right to Weapon Specialization, bonuses to saves against poison and spell
effects, and quite a few skill checks.

Gnoll Advantages (over Fighter-2):
+4 Str
moves at 10 feet faster than dwarf

Dwarven Fighter(1) Advantages:
Doesn`t have the -2 Int
d10 hit dice instead of d8
A multitude of other, less relavent, advantages including exclusive
right to Weapon Specialization, bonuses to saves against poison and spell
effects, and quite a few skill checks.

Gnoll Advantages (over Fighter-1):
+4 Str
moves at 10 feet faster than a dwarf
1 additional hit die
+1 Fort saves

Dwarf Advantages:
Doesn`t have the -2 Int
d10 hit dice instead of d8
A multitude of dwarven advantages including bonuses to saves against
poison and spell effects and quite a few skill checks.

Gnoll Advantages (over Dwarf):
+4 Str
2 additional hit dice
+1 BAB
+3 Fort saves

Okay, clearly the Gnoll and Dwarf arent balanced against eachother so the Gnoll needs some kind of ECL. Take a look at the Fighter(1) comparison. For the most part all of this balances against eachother, except for the +4 Str which doesnt have anything to balance with. I`d say the comparison
that comes closest is the Dwarven Fighter(2), though the Dwarven Fighter
still seems like the better choice.

Given that the Dwarven Fighter(3) is so much better than the Gnoll with ECL
3, I`d say that once the extra “goodies” are thrown in, the gnoll, as
written above, should probably be ECL 2.

-Lord Rahvin

The Birthright Homepage: http://www.birthright.net
Birthright-l Archives: http://oracle.wizards.com/archives/birthright-l.html
To unsubscribe, send email to LISTSERV@ORACLE.WIZARDS.COM
with UNSUB BIRTHRIGHT-L in the body of the message.

8

:slight_smile: I guess you are right, most challenge ratings seem to be a bit screwed up…

A friend of mine has this problem, since in all of his campaigns his players manage to defeat even very strong foes (with a challenge rating higher than the average party level by 4, maybe 5!), even though this could be a mistake of my friend… Anyway, I believe wemics can be very good characters, only a bit unbalanced, but they do have a level adjustment, at least.

If you would like to incorporate a playable race which is not as strong as the wemics, you could design your own; I have done so for my campaign (still on the design process). If you are interested in it, please drop me an email (RaspK_FOG@yahoo.gr).

9

[b]I think assigning this gnoll an ECL 3 is extremely harsh, even with adding
“a couple of little goodies.” Compare this Gnoll with a 3rd level
Dwarven(PHB) fighter:

…
[/b]

I agree completely, actually. I think the gnoll in this case is a pretty lousy race - I personally would agree as they are now, they’re a 2 ECL race, since their “race levels” are weaker than class levels, and the slightly improved ability adjustments help make up for that. I was simply quoting the book for the “official” stats, and translating those into a Savage Species format.

IMO, the best basis for comparison from the PHB is probably a half-orc, rather than a dwarf - they’re more similar, so the comparison is easier. Of course, half-orcs are a bit too weak, and dwarves are a bit too good in terms of overall bonuses.

A gnoll, when compared to a 2nd-level half-orc fighter:

-Average about 1 hp less (3 hp less not considering Con bonus)
-Has +2 Str and +2 Con
-Has -1 BAB
-Has +1 natural armor
-Has two feats less

Overall, that seems a fair comparison to me. The strength bonus will cancel out the effective BAB penalty for melee purposes, though the gnoll will qualify for feats slower and gain extra iterative attacks a bit slower. The gnoll has +1 natural armor, which is a pretty good bonus for a low-level fighter; being a couple of feats behind stings a lot, of course. The gnoll effectively has a +1 bonus to damage, fort saves and AC over a half-orc fighter, and will gain more hp as he levels up - the cost is being a bit behind in combat prowess. Overall, I’d say the gnoll comes out slightly ahead, but not enough to warrant an ECL - boosting the half-orc a tad is more fun.

(And yes, there are no half-orcs in Kansas, but they’re still the closest PHB ground for comparison.)

I think this is a case where the responsible designers erred a bit too much on the side of caution. Making sure that the PHB races remain playable is a good goal, though - essentially, it seems, they want you to choose between power (baseline races) or uniqueness (strange races).

I fully agree that this ECL should be based solely on hit dice, with no level adjustment - their stats are better than for other races, but their race levels are weak, and they don’t gain much in the way of racial abilities to compensate for that, so “stats are it.”

10

I will probably choose to go with a ECL 2 Gnoll, with the +2 Con at 1st level and the +2 Str at second and no other major changes. All of the race are a little more powerful than the standard anyway (as are the BR races, even the humans) so this should work out ok.

Now some other races, mostly new races I’m creating from the ground up. Here are a few ideas of what I’m looking at for racial abilities so far, I’m interested in comments and suggestions, especially any balance issues.

ASLA
(a panther-like humanoid race)

+2 Dex, -2 Int, -2 Cha
+1 Natural armour (fur)
Low light vision
Medium Size
Speed: 30ft

Proficient with unarmed combat and spear
Claw attack (1d4/1d4) if unarmed
+2 Spot, Listen, Wilderness Lore (jungle lore?)

Favoured Class: Ranger (male), Cleric (female)

QUALA
(a small reptilian race)

+2 Dex, -2 Con, -2 Str
Small Size
Speed: 40ft (what does this effect?)
+8 skill points at 1st level, +2 skill points/additional level

Favoured Class: Rogue

SSARAK
(a race of snakemen)

+2 Int, +2 Cha
Dragon Blood (can cast true magic)
Constrict small and smaller creatures for 1d4+3 (after successful grapple)
Medium Size
Speed: 30ft
+2 natural armour (scales)

Favoured Class: Sorcerer

Then there will be the Wermics (although they will have a new name) and Beast-men, both are primarily monster or enemy races, but I’ll try and make them available for PCs as well, and of course there will be the human tribes, up to 10 in fact.

11

[b]ASLA
(a panther-like humanoid race)

+2 Dex, -2 Int, -2 Cha
+1 Natural armour (fur)
Low light vision
Medium Size
Speed: 30ft

Proficient with unarmed combat and spear
Claw attack (1d4/1d4) if unarmed
+2 Spot, Listen, Wilderness Lore (jungle lore?)

Favoured Class: Ranger (male), Cleric (female)
[/b]

Seems ok to me. Note that there’s a difference between unarmed combat and natural weapons - creatures with natural weapons are considered armed for the purpose of attacks of opportunity, for instance - a creature with natural weapons is never unarmed, and I think they’re always proficient with their natural weapons. Wilderness Lore stays the same regardless of terrain, though you can easily give a circumstantial bonus - i.e. “+2 to wilderness lore checks in warm forest terrain.”

[b]QUALA
(a small reptilian race)

+2 Dex, -2 Con, -2 Str
Small Size
Speed: 40ft (what does this effect?)
+8 skill points at 1st level, +2 skill points/additional level

Favoured Class: Rogue
[/b]

Speed has a pretty substantial effect on combat, and grants some interesting extra options. Not a bad bonus by itself. I think the skill point bonus is pretty big, though, but probably not too much out of whack.

[b]SSARAK
(a race of snakemen)

+2 Int, +2 Cha
Dragon Blood (can cast true magic)
Constrict small and smaller creatures for 1d4+3 (after successful grapple)
Medium Size
Speed: 30ft
+2 natural armour (scales)

Favoured Class: Sorcerer
[/b]

I get some alarm bells here. +2 natural armor is a very, very good bonus for wizards and sorcerers - this race sounds like a no-brainer for a spellcaster. Compared to a human, it’s probably too good.

Int bonus - a bit better than the human skill bonus.
Cha bonus - essentially a bit better than a bonus feat for a sorcerer for spellcasting alone.
+2 natural armor - very good for arcane spellcasters.
Constrict - icing the cake.

I’d say this race is a bit over the top, all things considered. I’d either change the way their affinity for magic bonuses work out all around, or I’d boost them a bit and make them ECL 2.

On a strictly mechanical note, constrict should simply do a d4 or d6 damage, modified by the Ssarak’s strength modifier (generally x1.5 for a bonus; i.e a 14 Str yields d4+3 constrict damage).

I think the racial bonuses you’ve come up with overall has a bit of a bland feel to it - though that could just be the lack of flavor text. If you could provide a bit more detail on the races, especially the former two, it’d be easier to come up with some alternate ideas for mechanics.

12

The descriptions of the races (and flavour text for abilities) is the next thing I will be working on. I’m in the process of changing them from their original info, so some changes still need to be made.

I’ll write them up and post the complete race descriptions when done, what I posted before was just some very early ideas for racial abilities. The Ssarak especially need some changes, as they remain a very powerful race (and rightly so, as it was their empire that was perhaps the only one to successfully resist Azrai’s armies.) I’m not opposed to making them ECL 1 or 2 to balance them. The natural armour bonus could be dropped or reduced to +1, as that was only something I added at the last moment (thinking, well they have scales, that must protect them somewhat). Constrict will have to stay as removing that would mean changing the race too much (they have a snake-like body and head with humanoid torso and head).

13

Well, I checked something on the wemic statistics: does it not strike you as odd, the fact that they get a +4 bonus out of their Monstrous Humanoid Hit Dice in… Will Saves? Why Will and not Fortitude? Do you want the answer? Well, initially, wemics were designed to be monsters or NPCs and not PCs, thus they had to balance their probably low Will saving (or the equivalent saves, like vs. spell, vs. wand and such in 2e).