Count Strahd von Zarovich

Dungeons & Dragons BRWiki Discussions
1

Discussion thread for [Count Strahd von Zarovich](http://www.birthright.net/brwiki/index.php/Count Strahd von Zarovich). If you would like to add a comment, click the Post Reply button.

So, how do you like this page for Count Strahd?

2

After a brief peruse, I would suggest that you swap the order of sections and make the character details come first, then the biography/description, then finally the big picture. That will be more in line with other characters in the wiki, and allows the basic details to be immediately visible on entering this page.

Sorontar.

3

With the Werewolf thread mentioning vampires, I thought I’d do some thread Necromancy.

I’ve added Strahd to my campaign, as you can probably tell. His domain, Barovia, replaces the Vampire’s Hold. I think it’s awesome, really. I have his 2nd Edition statistics in the 25th Anniversary Edition of Ravenloft; and you can get his 3rd edition Statistics from the “new” Expedition to Ravenloft.

Elton.

4

That is actually kind of cool.

5

At 06:03 AM 7/11/2007, Elton Robb wrote:

>I`ve added Strahd to my campaign, as you can probably tell. His

domain, Barovia, replaces the Vampires Hold. I think its
awesome, really. I have his 2nd Edition statistics in the 25th
Anniversary Edition of Ravenloft; and you can get his 3rd edition
Statistics from the “new” Expedition to Ravenloft.

Thats interesting. I like the Vampire as a villain, but he is more monstrous than might be appropriate for the political interaction of BR play. I added a bunch of character stuff for the Vampire in a write up for an awnshegh character a while back (Chiroptis) that makes the the character a bit more interesting, but it occurs to me that a good portion of that write up just makes him more like Strahd for all intents and purposes.... Still, Id probably want to portray
Strahd as a more bestial creature were I to use him to replace the
Vampire. Something between the two characters, if that makes sense.

Gary

6

I think you have the layout just right, Elton, but the formatting at the top looks a little wonky. Otherwise, good work!