On the whole I believe the Dutch are more fitting as a historical source for the Brechts than the Hanseatic League (HL). The HL was not really a union of states, but a loose association of trading cities. When they worked together they could be quite powerful (once won a war against the Kingdom of Denmark), but more often than not they couldn`t agree on political issues or squabbled among themselves. These cities never ruled a great amount of territory, if at all but controlled a large part of the trade in Northern Europe.
In Brechtür, the guilders are important, but their nations are still ruled by nobles. The cities of the HL, in contrast, were generally governed by a Mayor and a city council made up of the most influential citizens (rich traders). The Netherlands were officially a republic, but nobles nevertheless remained influential. The Dutch also won their indepence in a war against a Southern Empire (Spain), another similarity to the Brecht who won their indepence against Anuire.
Two additional notes:
irdeggman wrote:
When I (and I believe most non-history saavy people or those from the region in question) think of germans we don`t think of sea faring merchants, we think in terms of technologically saavy conquest oriented cultures.<<
I guess the notion of Germans as a militaristic, technology-orientated culture is based on late 19th and early 20th Century Germany, from about 1870-1945. This makes this stereotype kind of useless, if you do not want to re-create WW1 or WW2 in Cerilia.
For those interested in the HL, try to find a copy of the computer game Patrician 2. That`s a German game, originally titled Patrizier2, a complicated trade simulation, that captures the flair of the Hanseatic League quite well. The english version was once reviewed in the comic Knights of the Dinner Table, but maybe hard to find